This Month
December 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Year Archive
View Article  I must be attending the wrong ICANN meetings
Susan Crawford posted an anonymous comment that makes some powerful and controversial statements in the post "Time for Reformation of ...   more »
View Article  domaincestry
in my comments to the ICANN board yesterday I noted that Roberto Gaetano and I first met at the original CORE meetings in '97/'98.

I was struck by the number of people who I first met back then that are still well involved in the process. They include the following:

- Roberto Gaetano (ICANN board member)
- Hal Lubsen (CEO, Afilias)
- Ken Stubbs (GNSO council)
- Amadeu Abril i Abril (former board member, former gnso member, self-admitted ICANN groupie)
- Antony Van Couvering (founder NetNames, traveled to Tuvalu with me in '98 in the early .tv fiasco)
- Bob Connely (registrar emiritus)
- John Kane (now with enom)
- Richard Lindsay (formerly of GMO)
- Nigel Roberts (Jersey ccTLD)
- Jonathan Robinson (NetBenefit)
- Tom Barrett (encirca and .pw)
- Dave Crocker (brandenburg)
- Kent Crispin (songbird)

I am sure I am missing others. Who else was there that is still involved?
View Article  hmmm......perhaps they can
let's see. ombudsman, check. progress in the IANA function, check. hearty new gtld discussion, check. a strong contribution from nomcom in manning key ICANN posts, check (especially the addition of joi!). peaceful relations between ICANN and Verisign? well, four out of five isn't bad.

I saw more clear signs of progress at this meeting then I have at any other in all the years I have been attending these things. frank fowlie looks really promising as the new ombudsman. doug barton, ex-yahoo dns geek, appears to be making real progress with the IANA function. these two things have been constant laments from ICANN critics.

the contribution of the nominating committee is especially interesting. I had originally thought of the nominating committee as a bridge to eventual direct elections. now I am not so sure. if the nominating committee keeps stocking the pool with strong candidates that appear to be quite likely to well represent the interests of internet users, not business, not policy and not governments, then the need for direct elections may be obviated.

bret, susan what do you think?
View Article  truer words have rarely been spoken
brewster kahle at web2.0:

"it shouldn't be a crime in this country [ed. or in any other] to give ...   more »
View Article  alls not orwell

we inch ever closer to "1984". my favourite line:

"The bill would train agents to investigate intellectual-property crimes"....   more »

View Article  of auctions and the prius

This is the longer response I promised. I will try and deal with three things. First, why we should be ...   more »

View Article  rim job

Another scary number that I was struck by today. Google came out with the pricing for their IPO. There ...   more »

View Article  growth is relative

I was struck by an article yesterday (that I can't link to because of a combination of the national post's...   more »

View Article  business vs residential users

 One of the mistakes I find service providers make on a regular basis is drawing a bright yellow line between ...   more »

View Article  so little posting.....

I have been completely inactive (from a blogging perspective) for over two months now. I thoght I would share a ...   more »

View Article  so why did we get together with boardtown?

Last week we took a big step down a new road with the acquisition of Boardtown, company based in ...   more »
View Article  should spam filters be free for ISP users?

- need for premium email

I wanted to make some comments in relation to both this syndicated article and to ...   more »

View Article  go to where the puck is going

This looks promising.

John Keegan has done a GREAT job of innovating on top of blogware. There is  a huge ...   more »

View Article  the battle for access is not yet lost

In the past I have talked about how access, the ISP business, was the only Internet service where telcos and ...   more »

View Article  who is doing who a favour?
 I was reminded today of the importance of customer service and how it is really a matter of culture that ...   more »
View Article  thanks
As I think back on 2003 and look forward to 2004 to I wanted to take a few moments to ...   more »
View Article  we all ought to be in pictures
As I use blogware more and more I have become convinced that there is an even larger opportunity in storage ...   more »
View Article  Whassis WSIS
There is much talk currently of the WSIS meeting taking place in Geneva next week which means some ...   more »
View Article  pot....kettle....black
In yesterday's National Post Mark Evans had a column that reinforced for me just how ridiculous the ILECs and Cablecos are.
   more »
View Article  get in your users clickstream (and a walk down memory lane)
I want to poke at the issue of what is usually called an "ISP Portal". I am referring to a ...   more »