|
|
||||
|
This Month
Login
Month Archive
|
Sunday, December 5
by
enoss
on Sun 05 Dec 2004 04:20 PM SAST
Susan Crawford posted an anonymous comment that makes some powerful and controversial statements in the post "Time for Reformation of ... more »
Saturday, December 4
by
enoss
on Sat 04 Dec 2004 04:36 AM EST
in my comments to the ICANN board yesterday I noted that Roberto Gaetano and I first met at the original CORE meetings in '97/'98.
I was struck by the number of people who I first met back then that are still well involved in the process. They include the following: - Roberto Gaetano (ICANN board member) - Hal Lubsen (CEO, Afilias) - Ken Stubbs (GNSO council) - Amadeu Abril i Abril (former board member, former gnso member, self-admitted ICANN groupie) - Antony Van Couvering (founder NetNames, traveled to Tuvalu with me in '98 in the early .tv fiasco) - Bob Connely (registrar emiritus) - John Kane (now with enom) - Richard Lindsay (formerly of GMO) - Nigel Roberts (Jersey ccTLD) - Jonathan Robinson (NetBenefit) - Tom Barrett (encirca and .pw) - Dave Crocker (brandenburg) - Kent Crispin (songbird) I am sure I am missing others. Who else was there that is still involved?
by
enoss
on Sat 04 Dec 2004 11:10 AM SAST
let's see. ombudsman, check. progress in the IANA function, check.
hearty new gtld discussion, check. a strong contribution from nomcom in
manning key ICANN posts, check (especially the addition of joi!). peaceful relations between ICANN and Verisign? well, four out of five isn't bad.
I saw more clear signs of progress at this meeting then I have at any other in all the years I have been attending these things. frank fowlie looks really promising as the new ombudsman. doug barton, ex-yahoo dns geek, appears to be making real progress with the IANA function. these two things have been constant laments from ICANN critics. the contribution of the nominating committee is especially interesting. I had originally thought of the nominating committee as a bridge to eventual direct elections. now I am not so sure. if the nominating committee keeps stocking the pool with strong candidates that appear to be quite likely to well represent the interests of internet users, not business, not policy and not governments, then the need for direct elections may be obviated. bret, susan what do you think? Wednesday, October 6
by
enoss
on Wed 06 Oct 2004 12:25 PM EDT
brewster kahle at web2.0:
"it shouldn't be a crime in this country [ed. or in any other] to give ... more » Wednesday, September 29
by
enoss
on Wed 29 Sep 2004 11:33 AM EDT
we inch ever closer to "1984". my favourite line: "The bill would train agents to investigate intellectual-property crimes".... more » Monday, September 27
Tuesday, July 27
by
enoss
on Tue 27 Jul 2004 12:08 PM EDT
Another scary number that I was struck by today. Google came out with the pricing for their IPO. There ... more »
by
enoss
on Tue 27 Jul 2004 11:39 AM EDT
I was struck by an article yesterday (that I can't link to because of a combination of the national post's... more » Friday, July 2
Tuesday, June 29
Sunday, April 25
by
enoss
on Sun 25 Apr 2004 11:52 AM EDT
Last week we took a big step down a new road with the acquisition of Boardtown, company based in ... more » Friday, April 9
Monday, March 15
by
enoss
on Mon 15 Mar 2004 09:29 AM EST
This looks promising. John Keegan has done a GREAT job of innovating on top of blogware. There is a huge ... more » Monday, February 9
Monday, January 19
Monday, January 5
Friday, December 12
Sunday, December 7
Thursday, November 27
by
enoss
on Thu 27 Nov 2003 06:05 PM EST
In yesterday's National Post Mark Evans had a column that reinforced for me just how ridiculous the ILECs and Cablecos are.
more » |
thinks I read I think
|
||